Cover-to-Cover – Week One

Already a week in, and things have gotten pretty strange.  Let’s catalogue the depravity of humankind so far:

We manage to make it all the way to generation two before cold-blooded murder enters into the picture.  And it is violence at its worst…  religiously motivated violence.  What is Cain upset about?  Abel had an “acceptable” offering and he didn’t.  What a whiner baby.

“Sons of God” (whoever they were) getting with “Daughters of Men” (whoever they were).  Nice.

In fact, things get so bad that we are only six chapters into human history and God has to re-boot the human race with Noah.  Not that Noah and his family are any real prize.  Right after they get off the boat, there is some odd encounter involving Noah in the buff and one of his sons.

Shortly afterward, humankind tries to build a tower to “reach” Heaven.  Some people just don’t get it.

Abra(ha)m (the forefather of three world religions) pawns his wife off not once, but twice as his sister, in order to save his hide.  And technically, it wasn’t a lie.  She was his half-sister.  Its own brand of weirdness.  What’s maybe most troubling is that instead of some negative repercussion, he is “rewarded” with wealth in the form of livestock and money and slaves (?!?).

But all Abraham’s pathetic-ness doesn’t begin to touch that of his nephew Lot and his family.  Of course, the big clue is that Lot takes up residence in Sodom…  the ancient equivalent of Las Vegas, Amsterdam, and Bangkok all rolled up into one.  So when two angels come to “visit” Lot there, the citizens of Sodom come to his house to have “relations” with his house guests.  Lot’s brilliant solution?  Offer up his daughters to the crowd instead.

Speaking of his daughters…  one’s at a loss of words to know what to say about the whole incident with between them and Lot in the cave.  I mean really?  Lot was completely oblivious?  Really?  Just sick…  and coming from someone who lives in Arkansas, that says a lot.

It sort of seems like the writer of Genesis is going out of his or her way to say, “look at humanity at its most messed up, most broken, most depraved.”  This is the sort of stuff we would expect for soap operas, not God’s “chosen” people.  I find it interesting that the writer never says, “and they were very wicked” or “in doing this they sinned against the Lord.”  There is a remarkable silence when it comes to the behavior of these earliest biblical characters.  It is as if the writer is attempting to draw our attention to a much larger, grander story than the failings (no matter how spectacular) of these biblical characters.

In fact, perhaps the single most helpful thing to bear in mind during this year-long project is that the main character of the Bible is God…  not us.  And if we listen attentively to these early chapters of human history with this truth in mind, the tune we begin to hear is that God is faithful.  And He is good.  Even when we are not.

Tim Keller on Genesis 1 and Evolution

I know that the Genesis 1-3 reading was a couple days ago, but I stumbled across this paper that Tim Keller wrote to address several of the questions that are raised concerning Genesis 1.

He has written a few books that have been very well received, The Reason for God, The Prodigal God, and Counterfeit Gods. And from what can be gleaned by reading Deep Church, his ministry in New York exercises a considerable influence on Belcher and others like him.

In this paper, he addresses the following three questions:

Question #1: If God used evolution to create, then we can’t take Genesis 1 literally, and if we can’t do that, why take any other part of the Bible literally?

Question#2: If biological evolution is true—does that mean that we are just animals driven by our genes, and everything about us can be explained by natural selection?

Question #3: If biological evolution is true and there was no historical Adam and Eve how can we know where sin and suffering came from?

His answers are well worth reading.

Three Books from 2009

Ok, I read a few books last year.  I’d like to share three.  They weren’t published last year, but that’s when I read (or re-read) them.  You would be doing yourself a favor to get your hands on any of them.

This is one is sort of a no-brainer.  If you only read one book this year, it should probably be this one.  In many respects, this is Wright at his finest.  He is a book writing machine.  Some of them very academic.  Others far less so.  I’d say this is written for something of a broader audience, but it ain’t no Joel Osteen, if you get my drift.  Here, he presents as robust a vision of resurrection life.  And who doesn’t need that?  Thought so.

I had the pleasure of re-reading this book this year and was reminded how good it is.  It is not difficult to read, and it helps people get a grasp on understanding how to interpret Scripture.  It is the difference between giving a man a fish, and teaching him how to fish.  The latter being obviously infinitely more valuable.  One person who read this with me said that she thought every Christian should read it…  and I couldn’t disagree.

This one may come as something of a surprise, but man, that J. K. can weave a tale.  Sometime in 2009, shortly after number six came out in the theaters, I got started on the series.    They are all enjoyable, but this one seems to be the best of the ones I’ve read so far.

I know that there are those who have sizable misgivings about the Potter series.  I share some concerns, but it isn’t the outright witchcraft that bothers me.  Things like mistrust for the “Ministry” and episodes of cutting loom larger in my mind.  And yet, occasionally you can come across some stuff that is about as solid as it comes…

“I do not think [Voldemort] understands why, Harry, but then, he was in such a hurry to mutilate his own soul, he never paused to understand the incomparable power of a soul that is untarnished and whole.”

Albus Dumbledore from Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I can scarcely think of a more fitting description of the damage we do to ourselves when we choose to live life other than the way it was intended to be lived.

Naturally, in order to appreciate number five, you’ll need to get after the four that lead up to it.  The one thing that is both genius and diabolical (but in a good way) is that you can’t really be in for just one.  As soon as you read the first twenty pages of Sorcerer’s Stone, you are in for the loooonng haul.

Alright, times a wasting.  Get on it.

In the beginning…

Andrew Bird – Ten-You-Us

I love “beginnings.”  And today we have a few.

The first is the beginning of a new year.  2010.  I seem to remember a science-fiction movie from the ‘80s bearing this year as a title.  I’m going to have to go back and re-watch it to see how much they got right.  My guess is not much.

It is customary to make resolutions as the new year begins.  I’ve certainly made more than a few in past years.  Nothing against them.  However, as I get older, I find myself more and more hesitant to make them.  My life is already littered with enough unfinished stuff that I don’t really have any business making any grand new promises that I may or may not be able to keep.

Save one.  I mentioned it a few days ago, but let me say it again if only to remind myself.

Today, I’m beginning to read the Bible from cover to cover.

I do, in fact, hope to accomplish one or two other things this year, but this is the one.

Part of me wants to attack it Harry Potter-style.  That is to tear through it in as rapidly as possible so that I can say, “Ok, done. What’s next?”  But that would defeat the purpose of taking on the project in the first place.  My hope in doing this is manifold, but mainly, I want to know the Author more.  So instead, I’ll be taking it at much more reasonable pace, a few chapters a day.

Which brings me to the most famous of “beginnings”…  Genesis 1:1.

It would be hard to guess how much ink has been spilled on the first three chapters of Genesis, but it is considerable.  Instead of my own commentary, let me point to another.

John Walton recently wrote a book on Genesis One.  I haven’t read it, but I’m very familiar with where he is coming from and would commend this book to anyone who would like to have their understanding of the biblical view of origins stretched.

He says, “We should not expect the Bible to answer the questions that arise from our own time and culture.  Genesis was written to Israelites and addressed human origins in light of the questions they would have had.  We should not try to make modern science out of the information that we are given, but should try to understand the affirmations that the text is making in its own context.”

Well said.

Ok, well I have high hopes for 2010 being an amazing year in all kinds of ways, and I trust that reading the entirety of the Scriptures will play no minor role in that being that case.