Cover-to-Cover – Week 2

As I’ve been reading along this week, I was reminded of the problem of setting versus date of composition.  Setting being the “when” and “where” the events are taking place.  Date of composition being when the story or book was actually written.  As you might suspect, as with everything Bible, this can be a very complicated issue.  However, the Genesis account will serve well enough to illustrate the difficulty.

Many conservative Biblical scholars would affirm Moses as the author of Genesis.  So, we have Moses writing some stuff down around 15th century B.C.  Of course, this means that Moses wasn’t a first hand eye witness of anything that is recorded in Genesis.  Which raises the question, how did he know?  I suppose there are some who would ascribe to a theory of God supernaturally revealing the info to Moses and he simply dictated what God said.  Most would affirm some sort of oral/written tradition that had been handed down over centuries, and Moses was the one who collected and shaped it into its final form.  Naturally, there are other theories about who wrote what and when.  Some would date the final form of Genesis much, much later.  Closer to 5th or 6th century B.C.

Anyway, all that’s sort of beside the point.  Mainly, I wanted to share a chart that might help you keep track of the flow of the story.  For what it’s worth…

Then, there is this one too.  It is loads of fun.

When Foster speaks…

…people should listen.

Elvis Perkins – While You Were Sleeping

I not only read the Bible.  I also read books about the Bible.  But in ultimate nerd fashion, I also read books about reading the Bible.

And this morning, I came across this quote from Richard Foster’s Life with God: Reading the Bible for Spiritual Transformation:

“In seeking to discover this with-God life it is helpful to read the Bible in four distinct ways.  First, we read the Bible literally.  Reading from cover to cover, internalizing its life-giving message. By reading the whole of Scripture, we begin to apprehend its force and power.  We enter into the original dynamics and drama of Scripture: struggling with Abraham over the offering up of the son of promise…”

It goes on, but the example of Abraham and Isaac is as far as we’ve read so far.  There are three other “distinct ways” to read the Bible, but you’ll need to read the book to get those.

Never fear.  I’m certain that I’ll be sharing other nuggets of wisdom as I come across them.

Cover-to-Cover – Week One

Already a week in, and things have gotten pretty strange.  Let’s catalogue the depravity of humankind so far:

We manage to make it all the way to generation two before cold-blooded murder enters into the picture.  And it is violence at its worst…  religiously motivated violence.  What is Cain upset about?  Abel had an “acceptable” offering and he didn’t.  What a whiner baby.

“Sons of God” (whoever they were) getting with “Daughters of Men” (whoever they were).  Nice.

In fact, things get so bad that we are only six chapters into human history and God has to re-boot the human race with Noah.  Not that Noah and his family are any real prize.  Right after they get off the boat, there is some odd encounter involving Noah in the buff and one of his sons.

Shortly afterward, humankind tries to build a tower to “reach” Heaven.  Some people just don’t get it.

Abra(ha)m (the forefather of three world religions) pawns his wife off not once, but twice as his sister, in order to save his hide.  And technically, it wasn’t a lie.  She was his half-sister.  Its own brand of weirdness.  What’s maybe most troubling is that instead of some negative repercussion, he is “rewarded” with wealth in the form of livestock and money and slaves (?!?).

But all Abraham’s pathetic-ness doesn’t begin to touch that of his nephew Lot and his family.  Of course, the big clue is that Lot takes up residence in Sodom…  the ancient equivalent of Las Vegas, Amsterdam, and Bangkok all rolled up into one.  So when two angels come to “visit” Lot there, the citizens of Sodom come to his house to have “relations” with his house guests.  Lot’s brilliant solution?  Offer up his daughters to the crowd instead.

Speaking of his daughters…  one’s at a loss of words to know what to say about the whole incident with between them and Lot in the cave.  I mean really?  Lot was completely oblivious?  Really?  Just sick…  and coming from someone who lives in Arkansas, that says a lot.

It sort of seems like the writer of Genesis is going out of his or her way to say, “look at humanity at its most messed up, most broken, most depraved.”  This is the sort of stuff we would expect for soap operas, not God’s “chosen” people.  I find it interesting that the writer never says, “and they were very wicked” or “in doing this they sinned against the Lord.”  There is a remarkable silence when it comes to the behavior of these earliest biblical characters.  It is as if the writer is attempting to draw our attention to a much larger, grander story than the failings (no matter how spectacular) of these biblical characters.

In fact, perhaps the single most helpful thing to bear in mind during this year-long project is that the main character of the Bible is God…  not us.  And if we listen attentively to these early chapters of human history with this truth in mind, the tune we begin to hear is that God is faithful.  And He is good.  Even when we are not.

In the beginning…

Andrew Bird – Ten-You-Us

I love “beginnings.”  And today we have a few.

The first is the beginning of a new year.  2010.  I seem to remember a science-fiction movie from the ‘80s bearing this year as a title.  I’m going to have to go back and re-watch it to see how much they got right.  My guess is not much.

It is customary to make resolutions as the new year begins.  I’ve certainly made more than a few in past years.  Nothing against them.  However, as I get older, I find myself more and more hesitant to make them.  My life is already littered with enough unfinished stuff that I don’t really have any business making any grand new promises that I may or may not be able to keep.

Save one.  I mentioned it a few days ago, but let me say it again if only to remind myself.

Today, I’m beginning to read the Bible from cover to cover.

I do, in fact, hope to accomplish one or two other things this year, but this is the one.

Part of me wants to attack it Harry Potter-style.  That is to tear through it in as rapidly as possible so that I can say, “Ok, done. What’s next?”  But that would defeat the purpose of taking on the project in the first place.  My hope in doing this is manifold, but mainly, I want to know the Author more.  So instead, I’ll be taking it at much more reasonable pace, a few chapters a day.

Which brings me to the most famous of “beginnings”…  Genesis 1:1.

It would be hard to guess how much ink has been spilled on the first three chapters of Genesis, but it is considerable.  Instead of my own commentary, let me point to another.

John Walton recently wrote a book on Genesis One.  I haven’t read it, but I’m very familiar with where he is coming from and would commend this book to anyone who would like to have their understanding of the biblical view of origins stretched.

He says, “We should not expect the Bible to answer the questions that arise from our own time and culture.  Genesis was written to Israelites and addressed human origins in light of the questions they would have had.  We should not try to make modern science out of the information that we are given, but should try to understand the affirmations that the text is making in its own context.”

Well said.

Ok, well I have high hopes for 2010 being an amazing year in all kinds of ways, and I trust that reading the entirety of the Scriptures will play no minor role in that being that case.